Comments for Allevate https://allevate.com/ Facial Recognition: Ethically Enabling a Safe and Secure Society Fri, 27 May 2022 10:04:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 Comment on Facial Recognition Accuracy: A Worked Example by LOW ACCURACY | Pearltrees https://allevate.com/2019/11/26/facial-recognition-accuracy-example/#comment-16273 Fri, 27 May 2022 10:04:38 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=14372#comment-16273 […] Facial Recognition Accuracy: A Worked Example – Allevate. ACLU Blasts Clearview's Facial Recognition Accuracy Claims. Facial Recognition Accuracy: A Worked Example – Allevate. […]

]]> Comment on Why Privacy Matters by Technology and privacy https://allevate.com/2013/10/28/why-privacy-matters/#comment-16082 Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:32:45 +0000 https://allevate.com/blog/?p=725#comment-16082 Technology and privacy cannot be bifurcated, they can co-exist and coexist. Technology is neutral, and privacy violations are not a problem of technology, but of unrestrained technology users. We agree that technology brings management efficiency to society, and it is not the technology that we need to manage, but the users of the technology that are constrained.

]]> Comment on Ethical Use of Facial Recognition: Doing the Right Thing by Ben https://allevate.com/2020/03/18/ethical-use-of-facial-recognition-doing-the-right-thing/#comment-15873 Sat, 15 May 2021 01:29:02 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=14485#comment-15873 I very much agree that the correct and ethical use of face recognition is very beneficial. But we should also guard against the infringement of face information privacy. Any unauthorized face information capture, how should we do? We offer a workable option to those in need.

]]> Comment on On the UK Police Use Of Facial Recognition and the Big Brother Watch Report by allevate https://allevate.com/2018/05/25/on-the-uk-police-use-of-facial-recognition-and-the-big-brother-watch-report/#comment-15004 Fri, 25 May 2018 17:25:11 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=2214#comment-15004 In reply to Helen Pender.

We absolutely agree with you. They do have a right to question. You do. I do. We all do.

That is what was meant by “open and inclusive debate”.

We also all have a responsibility to be accurate in our representations during such debate, or risk losing all credibility.

]]> Comment on On the UK Police Use Of Facial Recognition and the Big Brother Watch Report by Helen Pender https://allevate.com/2018/05/25/on-the-uk-police-use-of-facial-recognition-and-the-big-brother-watch-report/#comment-15003 Fri, 25 May 2018 17:16:06 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=2214#comment-15003 @bbw1984 is right to question facial recognition. Every time the police have been given new legislation, like anti-terrorism laws, they’ve abused them. Every time the police have been given new toys, like lasers, they’ve abused them. When faced with widespread evidence of corruption, the police invesstigate theselves and deny it. When faced with non-disclosure by police and CPS leading to people being falsely imprisoned the police apologise and carry on as normal. Public confidence in the police is at an all time low and you just get policemen complaining that they’re not corrupt, they just turn a blind eye to corruption. That’s called being an accessory.

]]> Comment on Facial Recognition False Positives: What They Really Mean by allevate https://allevate.com/2018/05/10/how-to-measure-facial-recognition-error-rate/#comment-15002 Thu, 24 May 2018 14:41:16 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=2137#comment-15002 In reply to Sadi.

I fear your system, and any system, would be reported on just as badly by Big Brother Watch, as the problem is not with the system, but the manner in which the results are being misrepresented.

]]> Comment on Facial Recognition False Positives: What They Really Mean by Sadi https://allevate.com/2018/05/10/how-to-measure-facial-recognition-error-rate/#comment-15001 Thu, 24 May 2018 11:08:07 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=2137#comment-15001 This problem cannot be resolved with simple logics. Only feature selection and network structure will overcome these problems. For example in ayonix, we deal with such cases for long years.
I wonder their database and cameras.

]]> Comment on Article: Facial Recognition: Profit, Ethics and Privacy by allevate https://allevate.com/2013/01/07/face-recognition-in-retail-profit-ethics-and-privacy/#comment-10206 Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:46:55 +0000 https://allevate.com/blog/?p=417#comment-10206 In reply to Jill.

Curious as to your views on the utilising solely for public safety benefits.

Working collaboratively with the police to detect and identify known criminals.
Barring undesirables such as repeat shoplifters
Working collaboratively with the police to detect and identify known missing children.

]]> Comment on Article: Facial Recognition: Profit, Ethics and Privacy by Jill https://allevate.com/2013/01/07/face-recognition-in-retail-profit-ethics-and-privacy/#comment-2272 Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:57:04 +0000 https://allevate.com/blog/?p=417#comment-2272 The moment that a store requires a scan of my face in order for me to purchase OR even just visit, is the moment that I stop patronizing that store. Thats right. You all better listen up clearly, retailers. The consumer does NOT want this no matter how badly you want it. WE control your wallet thickness….. would be a shame to see your wallets get very thin.

As a side note, I can see anti face recognition products making tons of money for the inventor.

]]> Comment on Cloud-Based Face Recognition now Accessible from Smart Mobile Devices to Enhance Public Safety in Europe by Juan Carlos Loayza https://allevate.com/2015/08/06/cloud-based-face-recognition-now-accessible-from-smart-mobile-devices-to-enhance-public-safety-in-europe/#comment-1387 Thu, 13 Aug 2015 05:55:21 +0000 https://allevate.com/?p=1144#comment-1387 Sirs we apreciate if you send more information for fave recognition from smart phones and all about security systems.

Best regards.

]]>